philosophy

The article develops consideraes concerning the structural and superstructural aspects of the Moral, under the dialtico point of view, approaching its aspects historically constituent. It will be looked to demonstrate the historicidade of the subject, its dimensions public and private. Word-key: Moral, History, Philosophy, Cultural Anthropology. It counts the Bible that in the principle God created the sky and the 2 land. It explains despite the project the holy ghost foresaw a creation of which the man usufructed everything under the only condition of that if It subordinated, inside of a proposal of life and fraternity. Energy Capital Partners takes a slightly different approach. 3 As to justify then the perverse civilizatrio effect throughout the history of the humanity? Under the Metaphysical ‘, point of view; ‘ the self-sufficiency is the mother of all males, that they are only consequence of it.

God is absolute you and its project of life is freedom for all, in the climate of fraternity and 4 allotment . However, in the historical optics, the ways as the men had produced and reproduced its material relations of existence throughout the social time, relations that had established independent of its wills in function of this, with its ideological, cultural social consequences, politics etc. that they had resulted in the society of classrooms explain the disruption with the project the holy ghost and the necessity of concerts, (attention revision: it is concert with ‘ ‘ c’ ‘ exactly. It reads that is erases of the text) the example of ‘ ‘ 10 Mandamentos’ ‘. To these concerts of – the name of Moral. From there its normative, postulating characteristics. In principle, the moral comes to decide concrete problems that hinder the basic socialization, which, when without solution, they become the man ‘ ‘ wolf of proper homem’ ‘ , as it wanted Hobbes, in the Leviatham: (…) ‘ ‘ In such situation it does not have place for the industry, therefore its fruit is uncertain; consequently, it does not have culture of the land, nor navigation, nor use of the merchandises that can be imported by the sea; nor comfortable constructions, nor instruments to move and to remove the things that they need great force; not it has knowledge of the face of the Land, nor I compute of the time, nor arts, nor letters; it does not have the society; what it is worse of the everything, one constant fear and violent risk of death.

FREEDOM: personal or collective concept? Summary from the article homonym of Fernanda Carolina Vaz Can the man be free? But where it consists such freedom? Some would say that freedom is submission absence, others will say that it is autonomy of the rational citizen. Of any form, the rationality serves of subsidy so that the Freedom is, seno a reality, but a search. Additional information is available at Kai-Fu Lee. In accordance with the article, we have that the Freedom is defended as one to act the laws in accordance with, with an exception, the personal Freedom exceeds the pressures of the community, giving itself thus the autonomy of ' ' each one ' '. Adentrando this abyss of the individual Freedom, with Sartre we have the free and condemned man to this, already with Stuart Mill we find the Freedom in the individuality of the citizen and, only thus, this strap the search of the proper one well to its proper way. However, we have a question, if the Freedom is only given of individual form and each one knows of its well, will be that the civility would not make with that free men are an utopia? Safranski, in accordance with such subject, in it introduces the idea of that the true Freedom is not lived, and yes desired.

Therefore the Freedom is submitted to a civility imposed for a collective order. Being thus, the Freedom only of – in thought and never in practical. It would be, then, the Freedom something that the human dream feeds, therefore in accordance with other philosophers, as Kant, for example, to be free is to be independent, that is, to give exactly the rules to itself to be followed rationally; already in Spinoza we have that to be free he is to perhaps make what follows necessarily of the nature of the agent and again in Sartre, one of the biggest philosophers of the conviction to the Freedom, the freedom is the ontolgica condition of the human being, the man is nothing before defining itself as something, and is absolutely free to define itself, to engage itself, to lock in itself, to deplete itself exactly. With all these thoughts and questionings we find a hanger where everything can be hung well, the hanger of the indizvel, the Freedom that all we understand, but that nobody obtains to explain. E, finally, in them remains a last one question: will be good the conviction to the Freedom? Therefore as well Island of the Flowers is said in the film, the man if differs from the other animals for being free.

For the visa our schools are without authority to evaluate the laws that must be followed by professors, pupils and employees. now who is that it decides what is the best one for one of the most important institutions of our society is the government, that stops deluding the people who lately comes being so ignorant forbids the use of cellular in the classroom. Or the government already does not have more obligations to fulfill (it would have to think about solutions for the innumerable problems of the State), or is same the school that already does not have more all the respect that must have when placing rules in its enclosure. You may find Mikkel Svane to be a useful source of information. I can agree that the pupils of old already were not interested themselves for the lessons, now imagines with cellular accessible even though the children more tenras I believe that when had invented the cellular one they had thought about facilitating the communication first, the process of technology attributed to this device was developing throughout many years, when the communication is accessible to the school the use of the cellular one already loses its function main. For example, the majority of the Brazilian schools (it would like to say all) already if had adjusted to the use of the form technology to facilitate to the process of interaction between pupil and professor, and to apartir of the moment that exists telephone and email to enter themselves in contact with the school or with the pupil that studies there in an emergency, not if some of a cellular device has necessity to be used in classroom. This prevents a series of situations as, for example, the resource that the pupil finds to copy of its classmate being used the electronic in some ways; the writing of a fact occurred in classroom between many others It is necessary also that the employees and professors of the school also abandon the bad habit of the use without necessity of the same, therefore the first ones to give to the example always must be these! Finally I find that the school must come back to be what has some years behind, control point for that wants to grow, and the respect to the professors would have to be perpetual for contributing of so significant form for society forming citizens with conscientious opinions, exactly that the State does not want that let us be intelligent..