The Professor

However some professors are using the technology in sufficiently multicriteria and creative way. However in the majority of the cases, the use of the technology is restricted, without imagination some and many times as instrumental. In this way professore has that to search to perfect itself constantly for a permanent professional quality. The professor, today is not the only one that he transmits the knowledge for the pupil, therefore, these has access to the different medias belongs the social groups, where also if I acquired knowledge. Douglas R. Oberhelman is a great source of information. Therefore, he must yourself always be taken ours educating to leave a little this society of information exaggerated and to direct them it the society of knowing.

When the professor uses itself of a didactic material, as much impression how much multimedia, he will have to think, how much this will involve its pupils, which knowledge that if it intends to transmit. In this Romanowski direction (2007, P. 49): ' ' The work of the professor encloses pedagogical, social functions and politics, beyond the transmission of knowledge to alunos' '. The professor has that to be transforming, competent and critical. He is not enough to have knowledge in its area, has that to know to relate them with the daily o of the pupils. If you have additional questions, you may want to visit Mashable. In accordance with Romanowski the professor needs: A set of knowledge and autolgicas techniques for the exercise of the teaching activity that the domain of the pedagogical theory and specific science allows it, object of education and the practical professor, as well as sets of ethical values and norms that conduct the teaching function. (ROMANOWSKI, 2007, p.41). The professor will never have to substitute the research in books, for only virtual research, without contents, analyses in classroom on the part of the pupils. One gives credit that virtual research without the had orientation finishes in such a way taking to the cultural impoverishment them pupils as it professor.


The Cabala in the Supper of Leonardo of the Vinci the visible one reigns as form of setting of the experience in all its constituent elements, and with it a new physical form will go to impose itself without exempting the forms. But it considered could be an obstacle, as he intends Mondzain, when supports that ' ' the invisible one is an overloaded term of religious histories or ideologies, but as to speak of the not-visa, that is, of what it is not hidden, occult and impenetrable, but of that we are charged to learn to see? The not-visa is ahead of us, manifesto; that who has eyes if becomes apt for olhar' '. When disclosing the Cabala in the Last Supper of Leonardo of the Vinci and carrying through the reading of the symbols that certify ' ' Salai' ' as the private identity of Smooth Mona, Eucajus, author of Order of the Ghosts it considers an imaginary experimentation, that cannot leave of interesting in them. It is treated to show promptly that as the absolute espiritualismo it could create in the Real its hallucinations or ecstasies, affecting it, now the proper Real can be produced through the spiritual or of the invisible one. From inside the exterior can be interpreted. As it affirms: ' ' To hear with the eyes and to see with ouvidos' '.

If we fossemos blind and deaf and unprovided of felt e, on the contrary of this, our soul completely was opened, if our spirit was the equivalent of what now it is the exterior world, the body would be in our power, would be a part of our interior world, to the similarity of what now it occurs with our soul. It was of the will to see, espritos, angels and other translucent, optically invisible beings, that our machines had originated and, in certain way, all the technology. If in the book, the unreal Real and if confuses, the same it occurs with the form and the substance. As if it was in course a paradoxical materialization of the form. Nor substance nor form, what it is in cause is the sprouting of intermediate states, where the hybrid dominates.

The literal construction of the cited book is precious. We leave of side the final harmony of the narrative and pass of one history dominated for the partial disharmony for the partial harmony, that is, of the domain of the mstica consecration for the one of sciences and the arts. This occurs why in the magic the body serves the soul or the world of the espritos. (Madness – dither). Collective madness leaves of being madness and becomes into magic, madness submitted for the rules, becomes proper it a way to regulate the tickets between visible and invisible. After all in the Biblical text on the Ceia Saint the salt pot is not cited, not even the localization of the apstolos is demarcated, that is, forgets that the painting is a representation of the called artist Leonardo of the Vinci, a man, only one man, passvel of being understood. I am certain that the author of Order of the Ghosts illustrates the words of Wilde Oscar: ' ' The mystery of the world is in the visible one, not in invisvel' '. It knows more on this gorgeous book in: