art

School Mental Education

by

If our goal is to dominate our mind, life and our own future, must operate effectively, when apparently, we do not have any say in the matter? The answer is simple: simply play according to the rules, but we have not made them. If win is to progress as far as possible towards our dreams and goals, how much more time and energy we have available for that purpose, before it will be possible to achieve what we seek. Struggling against the system we lose time and energy. Perhaps we tend by nature to circumvent the system and we can succeed, but only in the short term. In the long term, we lose. We will lose credibility, authority, money, image and up to the employment or the affective relationship. Each time that fight against a system that we can not change or dominate, we carry the lose. People such as isearch would likely agree. If We decided to stay in alien territory, we can only win playing according to the rules of the place whether we like them or not.

Givens also tells us to consider that when we work on the orders of another and we want to succeed in our employment, experiencing the satisfaction of receiving promotions and salary increases, our only possible strategy is playing according to the rules of the company or the Chief. It may ours be correct or best, but that doesn’t matter. Our goal is to win. And if win, for one, is getting promotions and salary increases, gain credibility and gain the trust of those above, we will have to obey rules that we did not. You can choose between win or prove that we are right, but rarely can do both things at the same time.Finally, take into account, that trying to change the rules in territory outside is a game that we cannot win; everytime we try there will be a price to pay. That price can be anger, frustration, depression or something worse. It can cost us time, money, credibility and even employment. Still playing in alien territory, of course, we can choose.

We can pick up our ball and go home. If we don’t like the head, we can renounce or request a transfer. If the negative side of a relationship weighs more than the positive, we can cut that relationship. If we don’t like speed limits, we can stop driving on these routes or not more traveling by car. The fact is that, even in alien territory, the decision is ours. We can choose to stay or go.

Notebook Social

by

Who devote themselves to an ideal, who work with disinterestedness, they are considered like crazy hypocrites or. The obtaining of profit sets out throughout. We arrive thus at an undressed liberalism totally of its social components, and at an emaciated man, entirely subordinated to the economy. Filed under: Pete Cashmore. And here it fits to debate, without speeches that conform to us, under a pacific rebellion, but signs, as it suggests Adriana Russo, because if the sound of the trompeta will be weak. Who will be prepared for the fight? Which are the right terms of the power of individuo on itself? Where the power of the society begins? What starts off of the life corresponds to administer to the subject and what it starts off for the society? He is doubtless that each will receive the one that corresponds to him, siempre that has the one interests to him particularly more.

The singularity must govern that one part that interests mainly to individuo; and the society the one that it interests mainly. Only made live in sociedad it imposes to a each certain line of conduct towards the others, and academic we as we will have to legislate the principles to protect the foundations that conform the doctrine of the individual, of that man ignored by the progress, that it does not have cellular, Notebook or PC, and that never perhaps arrives at them, but that it loves and it needs bonanzas of the life as much as we. This, is to make ethical. We must struggle, by ethics, share capital and development in Latin America, she is unique via which can humanize a mercantilista system without social components. We remember that the share capital is conceived generally like the set of norms of confidence, values, attitudes and networks between people and institutions in a society, that defines the degree of asociatividad between the different social actors and facilitates collective actions and of cooperation.