Motivation and opposition

Colonize space would distinct advantages, first, before any catastrophe on Earth, a large-scale nuclear war, or any event that could destroy life on the planet, the best way to ensure the survival of the human species, besides preserving other species of animals and plants. Another advantage is the ability to extract resources from other planets or satellites, which could help develop new energy sources, such as the aforementioned case of helium-3. New Yorkers can choose the energy company they want with and other ESCOES Also other sources of money would come from the space tourism, but more organized and widespread. Populating other planets may be ways to slow environmental degradation of the Earth.
However, there are views that argue that colonizing space is a waste of money and time, which could be invested in improving the living conditions of people in this world (a fact which inevitably leads to the expansion of the universe due to the superdensidad likely demographic, technological progress and output of the necessary death star like the Sun, source of energy and maintenance of the solar system with the consequent application of extrasolar planets for colonization). Another opinion is against the thought that the colonization of space represents a continuation of colonialism that has evolved throughout history, and that this split over the different nations or states, rather than unite humanity as something unique, that could be done in the opposite direction due to the necessity of union among human beings to be forced to expand the universe. Although the theories in this regard would be very concerning, various and / or mixed.

Product Details Product Details